Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4
at something -- as always describe it as the surface of mars. it looks at the surface of mars. you don't have much out there. in the desert floor at that time of the year, the hard mass. they did in the day again for shelter. there were a up. they could not get it into the ground. very hard today. not like you would see unless you have heavy equipment to dig down further. our panel was bad. on many aspects of this that we seem to be unprepared for when they went into the first night. the court, when he went down, actually three prepped with a rescue helicopter. so if they had just called one of them, notified properly, 45 minutes and 45 minutes out the cut got them off the ground and where he needed to be. he was communicating, would not have been a problem. but unfortunately they did not like how he got shot down. how he gets shut down as the starter all this, the friendly fire shoot and the mistakes that are made. and the way -- the mistakes and the flying of it, to me, it comes down to the fact that, well, is training officer did not shoot him down to clarify that point. these of the one i
've always described it like the surface of mars. the iraqi desert looks like the surface of mars. there's not much of the. on the desert for that time of year, the knights and shovels they can to dig in to shoulder, it's like digging -- they can get in the ground. it was very hard to dig. it wasn't salty sand like you would see a lesser heavy equipment to dig down for the. the hardpan was a bad. there are many aspects of this that they were unprepared for when it went into that first night. the quarter we went down was actually pre-prep with rescue helicopters. so if you just called one of them, they notified react properly, 45 minutes in, 45 minutes out, they could have gotten off the ground. he was commuting. so that wouldn't have been a problem. but, unfortunately, they did like how he got shot down. how he got shot down started all this. the friendly fire issue. and the mistakes that were made. and the way, the mistakes and the flying of it to become a comes down to the fact that, while his commanding officer did not shoot them down, to clarify that point, he's not the one who did i
it was like 1988, i think, '85 or '88, bid mar v. vinson, in a dissent, says this is historically not credible. this is not what they meant when they passed the first amendment, and he went through right down the line what they meant, and the first amendment was simply that the congress shall not establish a nationa church. that's all they meant. they did not mean we had a secularizing state. and, unfortunately, that has become the law. that is, that's the way we think of things now. people think of jefferson's words before they even know what is in the first amendment, and i'm arguing for the radical -- well, i'm arguing for the radical position. but that's william rehnquist's position. he's, of course, deceased. that everson was bad law. it should be thrown out. all those establishment cases should be just chucked. they're confused -- they're too confused to be able to rectify, and a sign of that is the court itself can't figure out how to balance the establishment clause and freedom of religion clause, free exercise clause. they get continually entangled on their own feet. so that's the mor
of that? what is beautiful about that? i conclude a mars cyst because the state will take care of my neighbor. cohad a huge demonstration on behalf of legal marijuana. wow. if my child had gone to a, let's celebrate legalized marijuana i would have believed i failed as a parent utterly. the mass simple involved here, that is what preoccupies you. you're now a free to get high on marijuana. just think about what animates a lot of people? it's just painful, frankly. so, this -- and social darwinism? is this what the left uses to attack the belief -- i don't even know what belief they're attacking. what about social darwinism? that the talented and the harder working get ahead? why is that darwinism? why didn't that merit? i have in there from -- i believe it's a harvard economist, a princeton economist actually. man won a nobel peace nobel pri. and he shows how much more television poorer people watch than richer people, because richer people don't have the time to watch tv. they work so hard to get ahead. this doesn't mean that poor people don't work hard but on average, in america, b
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4